- album big sean finally famous
- album big sean finally famous
- Big Sean#39;s Finally Famous: The
- Dont Tell Me You Love Me 3:56
- Big Sean Ft. John Legend
- pictures Big Sean signed with
- Big Sean - Finally Famous Vol.
- Big Sean - So Much More
- 2011 dresses Big Sean big sean
- Big Sean – Finally Famous
- Big Sean#39;s Finally Famous
- Big Sean - High Rise
- ig sean – finally famous vol.
- ig sean finally famous album
- tattoo ig sean finally famous album album big sean finally famous 3.
- Big Sean|Finally Famous III
- 3” mixtape has finally dropped
- Big Sean quot;Finally Famous
- EVENT: Big Sean#39;s Finally
images Big Sean - So Much More
wallpaper album big sean finally famous
2011 album big sean finally famous
more...
more...
2010 Big Sean#39;s Finally Famous: The
more...
hair Dont Tell Me You Love Me 3:56
more...
hot Big Sean Ft. John Legend
more...
house 3” mixtape has finally dropped
tattoo pictures Big Sean signed with
more...
pictures Big Sean - Finally Famous Vol.
dresses Big Sean - High Rise
more...
makeup 2011 dresses Big Sean big sean
girlfriend ig sean finally famous album
hairstyles Big Sean#39;s Finally Famous
Source URL: http://cyclistatlarge.blogspot.com/2010/11/album-big-sean-finally-famous-3.html
Visit amy winehouse for Daily Updated Hairstyles Collection
chanduv23
09-19 07:41 AM
Chanduv,
Did you meet any lawmakers? Please share the insights.
Regards
I did not meet the lawmakers nor did I attend the congressional reception - situation at home restricted me to just do the rally.
Please use this thread to share some nice funny moments
Did you meet any lawmakers? Please share the insights.
Regards
I did not meet the lawmakers nor did I attend the congressional reception - situation at home restricted me to just do the rally.
Please use this thread to share some nice funny moments
wallpaper album big sean finally famous
shirish
05-16 11:55 AM
I thnk no. As I-140 is only fo ryou. not fo rhte dependants.
So as long as you are married and your spouse is in US before you file AOS you should be fine.
Do you need to be married at the time of applying I-140 to get GC in the same application ?
My question is when is the latest that one can get married so as to get his/her spouse a GC on the same application.
So as long as you are married and your spouse is in US before you file AOS you should be fine.
Do you need to be married at the time of applying I-140 to get GC in the same application ?
My question is when is the latest that one can get married so as to get his/her spouse a GC on the same application.
sravani
05-15 10:53 AM
Hello friends,
My birth certificate has the following information
date of birth, Mothers name, fathers name, place of birth. It does not have my name and i am from India. Is it ok.. or should i get one with name.
My PD is not current but i am getting ready with all the documents, just in case it gets current.
If the certificate doesn't have your name, how will they know it's your birth certificate? :confused:
I don't think birth certificate without your name is acceptable by USCIS
My birth certificate has the following information
date of birth, Mothers name, fathers name, place of birth. It does not have my name and i am from India. Is it ok.. or should i get one with name.
My PD is not current but i am getting ready with all the documents, just in case it gets current.
If the certificate doesn't have your name, how will they know it's your birth certificate? :confused:
I don't think birth certificate without your name is acceptable by USCIS
2011 album big sean finally famous
perm2gc
06-29 05:25 PM
Are the attorneys and law firms spreading rumors about
EB retogression on July 2nd ?
Cynical view:
May be they hope to discourage other people from filing this
weekend?
Non-cynical view:
May be they everyone is nervous and gone insane?:D
one more nail on our coffin :D
EB retogression on July 2nd ?
Cynical view:
May be they hope to discourage other people from filing this
weekend?
Non-cynical view:
May be they everyone is nervous and gone insane?:D
one more nail on our coffin :D
more...
jamesingham
05-16 11:50 AM
Do you need to be married at the time of applying I-140 to get GC in the same application ?
My question is when is the latest that one can get married so as to get his/her spouse a GC on the same application.
My question is when is the latest that one can get married so as to get his/her spouse a GC on the same application.
tn1
03-11 08:40 AM
Sorry to hijack the thread.
My passport expires in June 2009. I have a valid H1B notice till Nov 2010. I was planning to get my H1B visa stamped on my passport. My lawyer asked me to renew my passport before I go for stamping. Will the indian embassy renew the passport if my expiry date is more than 1 year from the day I sent them the material ?
Someone please advise.
Also, I am sending all material to Washington DC. Do I just send all the material listed on the website ? Don't I have to correspond with them ? I can't seem to get anyone on the phone.
My passport expires in June 2009. I have a valid H1B notice till Nov 2010. I was planning to get my H1B visa stamped on my passport. My lawyer asked me to renew my passport before I go for stamping. Will the indian embassy renew the passport if my expiry date is more than 1 year from the day I sent them the material ?
Someone please advise.
Also, I am sending all material to Washington DC. Do I just send all the material listed on the website ? Don't I have to correspond with them ? I can't seem to get anyone on the phone.
more...
worriedsoul
05-16 04:06 PM
Thanks much for your help. Especially now that you are out of the rut; but your willingness to help others is higly appreciated. Hope all this effort will bring some positive outcome.
I had discussion with Mr.Gotcher about this issue. He said, AILA is collecting information on this matter and they are pursuing with Altanta center. But he does not believe or expect any positive outcome. As said earlier he insist to send a formal complaint with OIG and offered his time/help. As its affecting large group of people he refused to accept any fee. I offered we are ready to cover any expense which he might incurr, but seems like it would be very less and he offered free service. Mr.Gotcher will draft a letter in a week time. What we need now - lot support and signature. We do not need to provide any case number. so I dont believe there would be any consequence. So guys please come forward. Spread this news as much as possible and get enough support. Help yourself and get out of this mess.
Thanks.
I had discussion with Mr.Gotcher about this issue. He said, AILA is collecting information on this matter and they are pursuing with Altanta center. But he does not believe or expect any positive outcome. As said earlier he insist to send a formal complaint with OIG and offered his time/help. As its affecting large group of people he refused to accept any fee. I offered we are ready to cover any expense which he might incurr, but seems like it would be very less and he offered free service. Mr.Gotcher will draft a letter in a week time. What we need now - lot support and signature. We do not need to provide any case number. so I dont believe there would be any consequence. So guys please come forward. Spread this news as much as possible and get enough support. Help yourself and get out of this mess.
Thanks.
2010 Big Sean#39;s Finally Famous: The
GCNeophyte
08-04 11:14 AM
When USCIS sent you the RFE notice, you would have seen "Request for Evidence". After USCIS receives your response, you would have seen the hard LUD, while the header is still for RFE. Then after some days (with in 60 days), the header changes to "Request for Evidence Response Review", while the old header "Request for Evidence" vanishes. I was in the same boat like you. I spoke to my attorney's team and they offered me the insight glimpse of working of USCIS.
Do you know if this status continues after the 60 days? I had RFE and status is in "Request for Evidence Response Review" since we replied the RFE.
Do you know if this status continues after the 60 days? I had RFE and status is in "Request for Evidence Response Review" since we replied the RFE.
more...
Hassan11
03-18 12:57 PM
Link is here: http://immigration-information.com/forums/showthread.php?t=4285&page=26
Ron Gotcher said on his reply to some readers questions:
The mystery is solved. I have corresponded with Charlie Oppenheim in the Visa Office. He confirmed that the 27% limit does apply. He explained that during this fiscal year, the CIS consumed an unusually large number of Indian EB2 visas, thus making the category unavailable despite a retrogression in the cuoff date which was intended to hold number use within the limit.
He said that based on his discussions with the CIS, he was informed that the CIS did not feel that the current amount of pending Indian first preference demand would be insufficient to use all available numbers under the limit. Therefore, he allowed some of those numbers to fall down into Indian second preference.
So, the Indian second preference numbers used to establish a cutoff date for April are coming from left over Indian first preference, not worldwide numbers.
__________________
Ron Gotcher said on his reply to some readers questions:
The mystery is solved. I have corresponded with Charlie Oppenheim in the Visa Office. He confirmed that the 27% limit does apply. He explained that during this fiscal year, the CIS consumed an unusually large number of Indian EB2 visas, thus making the category unavailable despite a retrogression in the cuoff date which was intended to hold number use within the limit.
He said that based on his discussions with the CIS, he was informed that the CIS did not feel that the current amount of pending Indian first preference demand would be insufficient to use all available numbers under the limit. Therefore, he allowed some of those numbers to fall down into Indian second preference.
So, the Indian second preference numbers used to establish a cutoff date for April are coming from left over Indian first preference, not worldwide numbers.
__________________
hair Dont Tell Me You Love Me 3:56
H1B_CIVIL_ENGINEER
01-10 06:00 PM
I got my US Masters degree in Engineering in 2002 and I was obviously concerned that I would be left out if this is limited to people getting degrees in last 5 years. I read the text and here is the crucial part for people like me:
"(ii)(I) obtained such degree within the United States during the 5-year period preceding the date on which the petition filed under section 204(a)(1)(F) for classification under this subparagraph is filed; or
(II) has resided continuously in the United States in a lawful nonimmigrant status since obtaining such degree; and"
"(ii)(I) obtained such degree within the United States during the 5-year period preceding the date on which the petition filed under section 204(a)(1)(F) for classification under this subparagraph is filed; or
(II) has resided continuously in the United States in a lawful nonimmigrant status since obtaining such degree; and"
more...
gc_in_30_yrs
09-14 04:28 PM
Disclaimer: I'm not an immigration attroney. Always laws/filing procedures/forms/fees are constantly changing so please check with USCIS or with your immigration Attroney for your situation.
Hope this helps!!! get vaccination, photo, birth certificate, marriage certificate......Good Luck to you all!!!!:)
This is excellent. Helps us a lot. Thank you.:)
Hope this helps!!! get vaccination, photo, birth certificate, marriage certificate......Good Luck to you all!!!!:)
This is excellent. Helps us a lot. Thank you.:)
hot Big Sean Ft. John Legend
TeddyKoochu
07-15 04:13 PM
so, you are saying dates in eb2 moved because, few of the eb2 folks showed up in DC. I think its time for you to up your medication...
eastindia is neither Eb2/EB3 nor from India, he has been creating waves on almost every active blog, yesterday he received quite a few responses on EB2-EB3 Predictions calculations blog. I hope the IV Admins / moderators are reading and take necessary action. He / She is just enjoying at our expense just by creating confusion.
eastindia is neither Eb2/EB3 nor from India, he has been creating waves on almost every active blog, yesterday he received quite a few responses on EB2-EB3 Predictions calculations blog. I hope the IV Admins / moderators are reading and take necessary action. He / She is just enjoying at our expense just by creating confusion.
more...
house 3” mixtape has finally dropped
abhisam
04-12 01:12 PM
page 10 of 11...
There are only 2 locations now for most cases.... Phoenix and Dallas... wonder where did you get instructions to file to NSC...
http://www.uscis.gov/files/form/i-765instr.pdf
I was looking at a different file: http://www.uscis.gov/files/form/I-765instr.pdf
any idea how i can resolve this?! :(
There are only 2 locations now for most cases.... Phoenix and Dallas... wonder where did you get instructions to file to NSC...
http://www.uscis.gov/files/form/i-765instr.pdf
I was looking at a different file: http://www.uscis.gov/files/form/I-765instr.pdf
any idea how i can resolve this?! :(
tattoo pictures Big Sean signed with
Houstonguy
05-05 04:22 PM
PD is May 15, 2006. Still waiting...Can any one suggest what is the best way to expedite it..
more...
pictures Big Sean - Finally Famous Vol.
sundevil
07-12 12:10 AM
So there is a possibility that they will issue August Bulletin with limited date movement and act like July bulletin events never happened? Man, and we keep thinking they cannot sink any lower.
Is there a written rule that they have to request number only when they are about to approve a 485? Or is it just been a USCIS procedure. In the latter case they can change it when they want. Then they would have played everything by the rule.
1. On Jun 12 th there were lot of numbers.
2. July 2nd numbers were gone, through USCIS requests.
3. But wait a minute come July 10th some were returned(which is also legal). Now DOS may say numbers are not zero and potentially issue Aug bulletin with June dates or little movement.
4. Every new application now gets them higher fee.
And this could potentially be defense against the lawsuit. May be I am giving too much credit to USCIS but this has the makings of a great book for some official when he/she quits this administration(Like lot of others who have done this earlier).
So is it possible that the following was USCIS' plan all along in a bid to (1) force applicants to pay the higher fees and (2) reduce the number of applications they would receive. So let's try and see where USCIS or DOS acually broke the law. BTW, the following is pure speculation on my part.
1. DOS makes all categories current in the visa bulletin dated June 12.
2. This screws up USCIS's plans. So they have to force the DOS to issue a revision before July 1st.
3. USCIS frantically starts requesting visa numbers. Even for 485s with pending FBI checks.
4. Come July 2nd, USCIS still hasn't used up all the 60,000 or so numbers, but still informs DOS that all visa numbers have been exhausted.
5. DOS publishes a revised visa bulletin dated July 02 where everthing becomes unavailable.
6. USCIS acts on DOS revised visa bulletin and decides to reject all I-485s filed on July 02 and beyond.
7. July 05 onwards, USCIS starts returning the numbers to DOS. This could be for applications that have pending FBI checks.
8. DOS now decides to use some caution before issuing August bulletin. They will probably not make all categories current, but will probably shift them by a few months based on June bulletin.
9. USCIS now gets all new applications with higher fees and a reduced number of applications.
Please add to this sequence of events if you think I missed anything.
IMHO, USCIS broke the law in #4. And DOS broke the law in #5 if it was aware that visa numbers were still being issued as of July 02.
Thanks,
Jayant
Is there a written rule that they have to request number only when they are about to approve a 485? Or is it just been a USCIS procedure. In the latter case they can change it when they want. Then they would have played everything by the rule.
1. On Jun 12 th there were lot of numbers.
2. July 2nd numbers were gone, through USCIS requests.
3. But wait a minute come July 10th some were returned(which is also legal). Now DOS may say numbers are not zero and potentially issue Aug bulletin with June dates or little movement.
4. Every new application now gets them higher fee.
And this could potentially be defense against the lawsuit. May be I am giving too much credit to USCIS but this has the makings of a great book for some official when he/she quits this administration(Like lot of others who have done this earlier).
So is it possible that the following was USCIS' plan all along in a bid to (1) force applicants to pay the higher fees and (2) reduce the number of applications they would receive. So let's try and see where USCIS or DOS acually broke the law. BTW, the following is pure speculation on my part.
1. DOS makes all categories current in the visa bulletin dated June 12.
2. This screws up USCIS's plans. So they have to force the DOS to issue a revision before July 1st.
3. USCIS frantically starts requesting visa numbers. Even for 485s with pending FBI checks.
4. Come July 2nd, USCIS still hasn't used up all the 60,000 or so numbers, but still informs DOS that all visa numbers have been exhausted.
5. DOS publishes a revised visa bulletin dated July 02 where everthing becomes unavailable.
6. USCIS acts on DOS revised visa bulletin and decides to reject all I-485s filed on July 02 and beyond.
7. July 05 onwards, USCIS starts returning the numbers to DOS. This could be for applications that have pending FBI checks.
8. DOS now decides to use some caution before issuing August bulletin. They will probably not make all categories current, but will probably shift them by a few months based on June bulletin.
9. USCIS now gets all new applications with higher fees and a reduced number of applications.
Please add to this sequence of events if you think I missed anything.
IMHO, USCIS broke the law in #4. And DOS broke the law in #5 if it was aware that visa numbers were still being issued as of July 02.
Thanks,
Jayant
dresses Big Sean - High Rise
irock
09-03 12:21 PM
I'm also still waiting :(. PD: Aug 2004, NSC.
bsbawa10,
I am here with you, loyal and forever unapproved.
USCIS makes me feel like that pimple faced frail kid from the phys ed who never gets picked first or remotely early for any team sport.:):):)
bsbawa10,
I am here with you, loyal and forever unapproved.
USCIS makes me feel like that pimple faced frail kid from the phys ed who never gets picked first or remotely early for any team sport.:):):)
more...
makeup 2011 dresses Big Sean big sean
barsha
06-29 12:27 PM
Is there any last date of doing medical if one needs to file by July31st?
girlfriend ig sean finally famous album
vjkypally
09-03 10:06 AM
:) Got approval today.
first received CPO email and later received welcome email.
PD:JUNE 2004
RD:08/25/2007
EB2 INDIA
GC Approved : 9/2/2009
Thanks everyone who helped me in the long journey .......
Hope you get yours soon. :)
Congrats!!!
first received CPO email and later received welcome email.
PD:JUNE 2004
RD:08/25/2007
EB2 INDIA
GC Approved : 9/2/2009
Thanks everyone who helped me in the long journey .......
Hope you get yours soon. :)
Congrats!!!
hairstyles Big Sean#39;s Finally Famous
goosetavo
03-29 02:18 PM
Looks like Advicacy Days ia happening just in time!
shreekarthik
06-16 08:48 PM
CIR bill is only supported by a few US citizenry groups. Even those Hispanics who are here legally do not support it. Let's face it. If it weren't for the provisions helping EB based PR applicants, even IV wouldn't support it. Given all this, I highly doubt if Dems will gain if CIR passes. I certainly can feel the general US public against CIR. And I live in Portland, Or, supposedly one of the best liberal states in USA. Best case scenario for this bill could be a pass, at the end of the year after elections provided all it's supporters get elected.
Remember even Mr. Bush said he wanted a immi. bill by the end of the year (wink wink)
Remember even Mr. Bush said he wanted a immi. bill by the end of the year (wink wink)
susie
11-04 10:32 AM
Nice Associated Press article:
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/H/HIGH_TECH_SQUEEZE?SITE=MAFIT&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
Also, Univision (spanish network) highlif=ghts the same article
http://www.univision.com/content/content.jhtml?chid=3&schid=278&secid=284&cid=1332874
It would be nicer if the age-out problem would have been mentioned as one of the painful consequences of this immigration kaos.
Regards
I agree,
Sadly, there is no commonsense or compassion shown by the current immigration laws
The Dream act is seen by many as nothing more than an amnesty. If only they would only focus on the illegal children and include all other legal children and never reward their parents with a green card I feel there could be a workable solution so this act could go through
I have left a message with Durbin's legislator to contact me to try and get appointment to discuss and willing to fly anywhere at my own cost
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/H/HIGH_TECH_SQUEEZE?SITE=MAFIT&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
Also, Univision (spanish network) highlif=ghts the same article
http://www.univision.com/content/content.jhtml?chid=3&schid=278&secid=284&cid=1332874
It would be nicer if the age-out problem would have been mentioned as one of the painful consequences of this immigration kaos.
Regards
I agree,
Sadly, there is no commonsense or compassion shown by the current immigration laws
The Dream act is seen by many as nothing more than an amnesty. If only they would only focus on the illegal children and include all other legal children and never reward their parents with a green card I feel there could be a workable solution so this act could go through
I have left a message with Durbin's legislator to contact me to try and get appointment to discuss and willing to fly anywhere at my own cost
Source URL: http://cyclistatlarge.blogspot.com/2010/11/album-big-sean-finally-famous-3.html
Visit amy winehouse for Daily Updated Hairstyles Collection
%25255B1%25255D.PNG)
