- IS CASEY#39;S TATTOO HER MOTIVE?
- images 2010 tattoo casey
- Video: Casey Anthony#39;s tattoo
- tattoo Casey Marie Anthony#39;
- Casey Anthony trial update and
- Casey Anthony defense wants
- back casey anthony tattoo
- daughter, Casey Anthony
- tattoo dresses tattoo Casey
- casey anthony tattoo picture.
- hot makeup casey anthony
- girlfriend tattoo Casey
- tattoo casey anthony case live
- casey anthony tattoo bella
- Casey Anthony tattoo artist
- 2011 tattoo Casey Anthony
- casey anthony tattoo. tattoo
- girlfriend casey anthony
- house tattoo Casey Anthony
images daughter, Casey Anthony 
wallpaper IS CASEY#39;S TATTOO HER MOTIVE?
2011 images 2010 tattoo casey
more...
more...
2010 Video: Casey Anthony#39;s tattoo
more...
hair tattoo Casey Marie Anthony#39;
more...
hot Casey Anthony trial update and
more...
house casey anthony tattoo. tattoo
tattoo Casey Anthony defense wants
more...
pictures back casey anthony tattoo
dresses girlfriend tattoo Casey
more...
makeup tattoo dresses tattoo Casey
girlfriend casey anthony tattoo bella
hairstyles hot makeup casey anthony
Source URL: http://cyclistatlarge.blogspot.com/2011/01/casey-anthony-tattoo.html
Visit amy winehouse for Daily Updated Hairstyles Collection
Charleh
01-16 09:34 AM
Fixed it - found that I had set something to be slightly bigger than the parent control visible area and the animation wouldn't play. As long as the control doesn't overlap the parent area I'm OK!
wallpaper IS CASEY#39;S TATTOO HER MOTIVE?
starscream
06-06 10:29 AM
Below is a decsription of this amendment from AILA document which lists all the amendments that were discussed yesterday
http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?docid=22584
It confirms that the amendment #1231 applies to Y visa only. On the Senate discussion thread yesterday when this amedment was being discussed some body mentioned something along the lines that that Sen. Kennedy said he supported employer recruitment for all jobs and that really scared me ... I think Sen. Kennedy might have been referring to jobs that require the Y visa
This amendment does not mention anything on H1Bs. There was a lot of discussion on this point yesterday. I think we can breathe a litlle easy now.
The CIR does have other restrictions on H1B like $5000 more fees, restrictions for consulting companies & non-disaplacement clause but I don't think any GC type LABOR CERTIFICATION is required.
From the aila doc:
Durbin Amendment (#1231) to Remove DOL-Determined Labor Shortages as an Exception to Y Visa Recruitment Requirements
Senator Durbin (D-IL) introduced an amendment that eliminates DOL-determined labor shortages as an exception to employer recruitment requirements for Y visas. Senator Durbin argued that the amendment is an attempt to require that jobs be offered to Americans before they are offered to Y visa holders in the new worker program. Removing the provision in the underlying bill allowing the Secretary of Labor to declare labor shortages, he said, would achieve this, since all employers who use the Y visa program would always be required to offer jobs to Americans first. Senator Durbin cited the AFL-CIO as a strong supporter of his measure. Senator Grassley (R-IA), a co-sponsor of the amendment, also expressed his support for the amendment.
Senator Specter argued in response that this amendment is simply unnecessary, since American workers and their wages are already protected under the law. Senator Kennedy, however, expressed support for the amendment. He agreed with the general principle that a measure protecting American workers is good for the country. Ensuring that new Y visa workers don’t encroach upon American jobs or affect American wages, he said, is a step in that direction.
The amendment was agreed to by a vote of 71-22.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?docid=22584
It confirms that the amendment #1231 applies to Y visa only. On the Senate discussion thread yesterday when this amedment was being discussed some body mentioned something along the lines that that Sen. Kennedy said he supported employer recruitment for all jobs and that really scared me ... I think Sen. Kennedy might have been referring to jobs that require the Y visa
This amendment does not mention anything on H1Bs. There was a lot of discussion on this point yesterday. I think we can breathe a litlle easy now.
The CIR does have other restrictions on H1B like $5000 more fees, restrictions for consulting companies & non-disaplacement clause but I don't think any GC type LABOR CERTIFICATION is required.
From the aila doc:
Durbin Amendment (#1231) to Remove DOL-Determined Labor Shortages as an Exception to Y Visa Recruitment Requirements
Senator Durbin (D-IL) introduced an amendment that eliminates DOL-determined labor shortages as an exception to employer recruitment requirements for Y visas. Senator Durbin argued that the amendment is an attempt to require that jobs be offered to Americans before they are offered to Y visa holders in the new worker program. Removing the provision in the underlying bill allowing the Secretary of Labor to declare labor shortages, he said, would achieve this, since all employers who use the Y visa program would always be required to offer jobs to Americans first. Senator Durbin cited the AFL-CIO as a strong supporter of his measure. Senator Grassley (R-IA), a co-sponsor of the amendment, also expressed his support for the amendment.
Senator Specter argued in response that this amendment is simply unnecessary, since American workers and their wages are already protected under the law. Senator Kennedy, however, expressed support for the amendment. He agreed with the general principle that a measure protecting American workers is good for the country. Ensuring that new Y visa workers don’t encroach upon American jobs or affect American wages, he said, is a step in that direction.
The amendment was agreed to by a vote of 71-22.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
amitjoey
03-15 06:22 PM
I had contacted all the senators and house reps in New Mexico via their website and heard back from Senator Jeff Bingaman.
Please see his reply:
Thank you for your letter regarding relief measures to raise the quota of employment-based legal immigration visas. I appreciate your taking the time to write. I understand the important contributions made by high-skilled immigrant workers in our economy, and I will certainly keep your concerns in mind as we debate immigration reform in the 110 th Congress.
Again, thank you for writing. Please continue to keep me informed regarding this or any other issue of importance to you.
Sincerely,
JEFF BINGAMAN
United States Senator
Thanks for your efforts at raising awareness, here is one of the first instances where we did not get a standard letter talking about H1 back.
Please see his reply:
Thank you for your letter regarding relief measures to raise the quota of employment-based legal immigration visas. I appreciate your taking the time to write. I understand the important contributions made by high-skilled immigrant workers in our economy, and I will certainly keep your concerns in mind as we debate immigration reform in the 110 th Congress.
Again, thank you for writing. Please continue to keep me informed regarding this or any other issue of importance to you.
Sincerely,
JEFF BINGAMAN
United States Senator
Thanks for your efforts at raising awareness, here is one of the first instances where we did not get a standard letter talking about H1 back.
2011 images 2010 tattoo casey
fullerene
12-17 06:07 PM
Thanks for your prompt reply. I was wondering if you may have a separate section compiling all searchable supporting references together. I did not doubt that there should be summaries in the thread. It just like seeking a needle in a sea.
I am writing to a District representatives urging them to support SKIL Bill. I believe if some supportive evidence or references will make my letter strong.
I am writing to a District representatives urging them to support SKIL Bill. I believe if some supportive evidence or references will make my letter strong.
more...
aries
08-29 05:35 PM
any thoughts guys....
wandmaker
11-03 02:36 PM
Fastest way to move to H4 is goto India and get your H4 stamped or file I539 for COS to H4. If you apply for COS to H4, you application will be in pending state considering all the backlogs as VSC/CSC. You can move to H1 whenever you wish and you will not be counted against quota, provided you have not exceeded the 6 year limit.
Hope this helps.
Hi currently I am on H1B which is set to expire at end of November and will not be renewed. I have another position coming up but the visa application may not b e done till late December or January. I would need to transfer to H4 on my spouses status till then.
Can some one guide me in this process. What steps must be taken to transfer from H1B to H4? Is there any webpage which explains this step?
Is is better to file for H4 from USA itself or to go to India and do it?
Once I file for H4, does it have any impact on my filing for H1 from the new employer later in December or January?
Please assist me.
Thank you in advance.
Hope this helps.
Hi currently I am on H1B which is set to expire at end of November and will not be renewed. I have another position coming up but the visa application may not b e done till late December or January. I would need to transfer to H4 on my spouses status till then.
Can some one guide me in this process. What steps must be taken to transfer from H1B to H4? Is there any webpage which explains this step?
Is is better to file for H4 from USA itself or to go to India and do it?
Once I file for H4, does it have any impact on my filing for H1 from the new employer later in December or January?
Please assist me.
Thank you in advance.
more...
njboy
09-22 11:07 PM
You wrote-"(I am certified in both the subject)"
I am certified in both the subjects
Maybe you should attend some ESL classes yourself before teaching it.
I am certified in both the subjects
Maybe you should attend some ESL classes yourself before teaching it.
2010 Video: Casey Anthony#39;s tattoo
Blog Feeds
07-23 11:40 AM
U.S. Department of Labor has implemented a new integrated online system � known as the iCert Portal � through which employers can submit applications for permanent labor certification, labor condition applications (LCAs) and other applications for immigration-related DOL programs. In addition, the agency will introduce new editions of Form ETA-9089, the PERM labor certification application, and have already introduced Form ETA-9035, the labor condition application. iCert has already replaced the method of LCA filing for H-1B. The new iCert system begins to accept LCAs as of July 1, 2009. Employer and attorneys as the case may be, can still use the old LCA account but cannot submit new LCA. New LCA has to be filed from iCert.
Following are the new changes which has taken place:
- The new LCA requires writing the SOC (ONET/OES) code and the occupation title for the job.
- The new LCA has a section for basis for the visa classification supported by the application. There are the following categories:
a. New employment;
b. Continuation of previously approved employment without change with the same employer;
c. Change in previously approved employment;
d. New concurrent employment;
e. Change of employer;
f. Amended petition.
- One has to indicate the total number of H-1B/H-1B1 (http://www.h1b.biz/lawyer-attorney-1137085.html) non-immigrant workers.
- The new LCA also requires, in the employer information section, to indicate the Trade name/doing business as (DBA), if applicable, the old LCA does not have this requirement.
- In the new LCA, one is required to write NAICS code.
- There is a new section in the new LCA - Employer point of contact information, which requires to indicate the following: full contact�s name; contact�s job; contact�s address; contact�s telephone number; contact�s e-mail address.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2009/07/icert_portal_for_lca_filing.html)
Following are the new changes which has taken place:
- The new LCA requires writing the SOC (ONET/OES) code and the occupation title for the job.
- The new LCA has a section for basis for the visa classification supported by the application. There are the following categories:
a. New employment;
b. Continuation of previously approved employment without change with the same employer;
c. Change in previously approved employment;
d. New concurrent employment;
e. Change of employer;
f. Amended petition.
- One has to indicate the total number of H-1B/H-1B1 (http://www.h1b.biz/lawyer-attorney-1137085.html) non-immigrant workers.
- The new LCA also requires, in the employer information section, to indicate the Trade name/doing business as (DBA), if applicable, the old LCA does not have this requirement.
- In the new LCA, one is required to write NAICS code.
- There is a new section in the new LCA - Employer point of contact information, which requires to indicate the following: full contact�s name; contact�s job; contact�s address; contact�s telephone number; contact�s e-mail address.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2009/07/icert_portal_for_lca_filing.html)
more...
pawelw
07-05 01:51 AM
My I140 (and I485) were filed in May 2010 (EB2, NSC). My attorney just notified me they received an RFE regarding my eduction. Apparently USCIS needs more details on my MSc degree from Poland (integrated, 5 years) and explanation why is it equivalent US masters degree.
Has anyone had a similar hurdle when filing under EB2 with a degree like that? Should I be terribly worried about getting my I140 approved or do cases like that normally go through (provided that an RFE is correctly replied to)?
Has anyone had a similar hurdle when filing under EB2 with a degree like that? Should I be terribly worried about getting my I140 approved or do cases like that normally go through (provided that an RFE is correctly replied to)?
hair tattoo Casey Marie Anthony#39;
chanduv23
11-02 11:47 AM
Check out the pics from http://immigrationvoice.blogspot.com and get inspired by the positive response from the NJ meet
more...
kevnss
04-01 12:16 PM
I have posted this message in other threads couple of times but no reply so trying to create a new thread so it can be reviewed. Sorry.
I have one question though which I have already posted but didn't see any response. It would be nice if someone can clarify my doubt..
I have one question with regards to changing employer. My I-140 was approved long ago (in 2005) under EB3 and was filed for AOS during July 2007. But now we re-filed labor under EB2 got approved and refiled I-140 under EB2 category. I-140 under EB2 has been filed recently so I am assuming it will take months to get it approved. Now I am thinking of switching to new employer so what are my chances to move to new employer. Sorry am not sure if this message is already posted or not.
I have one question though which I have already posted but didn't see any response. It would be nice if someone can clarify my doubt..
I have one question with regards to changing employer. My I-140 was approved long ago (in 2005) under EB3 and was filed for AOS during July 2007. But now we re-filed labor under EB2 got approved and refiled I-140 under EB2 category. I-140 under EB2 has been filed recently so I am assuming it will take months to get it approved. Now I am thinking of switching to new employer so what are my chances to move to new employer. Sorry am not sure if this message is already posted or not.
hot Casey Anthony trial update and
clif
07-19 03:40 PM
The applications are traditionally processed in the order in which they are received and not by Priority Date.
more...
house casey anthony tattoo. tattoo
kirupa
04-13 12:00 AM
The reason this doesn't work is because WebClient works asynchronously. Your for loop runs to completion, spawning the appropriate WebClient instances independently without making sure the WebClient instance it spawned gets the data.
My quick advice would be to use something recursive where the function gets called only when a WebClient's completed event fires. You can use a counter that increments before the function gets called to simulate the index value as well.
Cheers,
Kirupa :nat:
My quick advice would be to use something recursive where the function gets called only when a WebClient's completed event fires. You can use a counter that increments before the function gets called to simulate the index value as well.
Cheers,
Kirupa :nat:
tattoo Casey Anthony defense wants
permfiling
08-14 12:07 PM
I have my old employer visa and I-94 valid till mid next year. My new employer had filed a H1 extension with CSC which was denied but I got a H1 approval notice without I-94 stub. I was told by my attorney to go to canada and get a new I-94 card as I have a visa stamped which expires july of 2011. Being in west coast, I was planning to go to vancouver. Any one been through this, please post your experiences.
Thanks
Thanks
more...
pictures back casey anthony tattoo
garybanz
08-30 10:10 AM
My date will be current from September 1st. Is it okay to travel to India on a short trip while the date is current? If 485 gets approved while I am india, can I still come back on advance parole?
One of my friends did this his green card was approved while he was away, he did not face any issues in returning or converting to GC later.
One of my friends did this his green card was approved while he was away, he did not face any issues in returning or converting to GC later.
dresses girlfriend tattoo Casey
phillyag
07-17 09:03 PM
????
more...
makeup tattoo dresses tattoo Casey
summerpolice
03-18 10:46 AM
I happen to hear that its more easy to convert from L1 visa to Green card .Is it something that the employer has to initiate ? Can we start the process by ourselves.
please shed some light on this.
Thanks
please shed some light on this.
Thanks
girlfriend casey anthony tattoo bella
golgappa
08-19 02:00 PM
Thanks for your reply I am really not in a position to wait, and I have a EAD as last resort..
BUT can I join on the same date...
Can you please share your views on that front...
BUT can I join on the same date...
Can you please share your views on that front...
hairstyles hot makeup casey anthony
neeidd
11-12 06:51 PM
Please send an email to info at immigrationvoice.org with a proof for your continuing subscription for us to check the records and fix this.
Thanks for your reply, Pappu
Thanks for your reply, Pappu
hiharsh
08-03 12:41 PM
Hi ,
I was convicted of petty larceny in NY. I was convicted of disorderly conduct PENEL CODE 240.20 on 05/25/2006 in NEW YORK . The actual arraignment charges applied were 155.25.165.40.
I performed 6 days of community service. Paid some $75. After a 1 year (5-26-2007) the charges were expunged. I have disposition letter from the NY court.
When I applied for my green card in July 2006 , in the I-485 / green card file I revealed that I was charged, convicted and arrested and my charges were expunged. I got my green card in August 2007 on the bases of VAWA (Violence against women act).
Now, I have been living in Maryland for the last 3 years.(Since September 2007)
I have applied for neutralization.
I am scared that I shall not be deported or citizenship should not be denied because of my conviction which is disposed almost 4 years old.
I have no charges against me after that incident.
I am filing my tax returns every year.
Do you think I can still be denied the citizenship? Or I can be deported ?
I would appreciate your response.
Regards
I was convicted of petty larceny in NY. I was convicted of disorderly conduct PENEL CODE 240.20 on 05/25/2006 in NEW YORK . The actual arraignment charges applied were 155.25.165.40.
I performed 6 days of community service. Paid some $75. After a 1 year (5-26-2007) the charges were expunged. I have disposition letter from the NY court.
When I applied for my green card in July 2006 , in the I-485 / green card file I revealed that I was charged, convicted and arrested and my charges were expunged. I got my green card in August 2007 on the bases of VAWA (Violence against women act).
Now, I have been living in Maryland for the last 3 years.(Since September 2007)
I have applied for neutralization.
I am scared that I shall not be deported or citizenship should not be denied because of my conviction which is disposed almost 4 years old.
I have no charges against me after that incident.
I am filing my tax returns every year.
Do you think I can still be denied the citizenship? Or I can be deported ?
I would appreciate your response.
Regards
dealsnet
01-28 08:34 AM
If you overstayed more than 180 days will trigger a ban. Apply for a visa, or try to find out from CBP or your local consulate or embassy, to find out the ban period. May be 3 or 10 years. You can appeal for ban waiver. Tell the truth at consulate, if not the ban will be greater.
Source URL: http://cyclistatlarge.blogspot.com/2011/01/casey-anthony-tattoo.html
Visit amy winehouse for Daily Updated Hairstyles Collection
